~Research Proposal~

Disrupting Navigation: a Hidden Menu UX Case Study 

21th October 2019

OVERVIEW

Hidden menus, like the “Hamburger Menu”, have been used in interaction design for years now, but are harming the user experience of the site itself. Thus, there needs to be a change in how navigation is handled to better the user experience and analytics for the client. 

GOALS

  1. Discover why the hamburger menu is counterproductive.  
  2. Provide good, clear research for future reference 
  3. Test new navigation designs (derived from the research data) 
  4. Report Findings 

Current Issues 

A Brief History 

In 1981, Xerox produced the Xerox Star, a personal computer with a fully functioning GUI. Within the GUI, there was a menu button that had three stacked lines that would reveal a menu upon a click. This came to be known as the Hamburger menu and it was designed by Norm Cox. After the star, the hamburger menu disappeared until Apple revived it in 2007. From that point on, designers have been using this hidden navigation for an easy navigation handling. 

Emerging Problems

People do not like to hear bad news, in this case, how hidden menus are counterproductive to both metrics and the user experience. What are these common problems? Hidden menus:

  • Lack of Discoverability and Navigation 
  • Decrease in web conversions 
  • Inconsistent  use in the Industry 

These problems are known in the design community but are not recognized. Thus, there is no push to change and the use will continue. 

Still in Use Today 

So if these problems are such an issue why is it being still used today? To start off it is easy for the designer to design one menu for multiple platforms. When designing for different screens, a hidden menu is a designer’s dream! The fact that you can design one element and then fiddle with it of different platforms saves time and money. Secondly, trends are more attractive than logic. When people have to think less about completing a task, they are much happier which means the experience is better. Therefore, if something is used all over the internet, like a hamburger menu, it seems intuitive to used that same element. Sadly, this is not the case: something that is used often does not mean they are good. Finally, this method has become a design standard. Since 2007, the hamburger menu is still in use around the internet and that will change until a disruptive innovation in navigation is shared and used. 

Research Methods and Materials  

Methods 
  • Unmoderated & Moderated interviews 
  • SUS ( System Usability Scale) 
  • Surveys and Questionnaires 
  • Heuristic Analysis
  • Competitor audit 
  • User Testing 
Materials 
  • Medium 
    • UX collective 
    • UX Planet 
    • Muzli 
  • Don’t Make Me Think – Steve Krug 
  • The Design of Everything Things – Don Norman 
  • Emotional Design: Why we love (or hate) everyday things – Don Norman 
  • Laws of Simplicity – John Maeda 

Research Plan

Books/Articles:

Websites:

People:
Brian Potter
Lauren Madden
John Kuiphoff

Resources:

  • Lightform or MadMapper
  • Online Tutorial courses
  • Animation course

Field:

Environmental Sustainability

Eric Branchek – Research Plan

I have written up a bunch of resources that I would like to check out.


People
Professor Nakra
Dan Shiffman
David Cope


Books
Algorithmic Composition: Paradigms of Automated Music Generation – Very detailed
Algorithmic Composition – A Guide to Composing Music with Nyquist – Goes over many concepts, but seems to focus on Nyquist
The Algorithmic Composer – An older book, but appears to be a good introduction


Resources
MIDI – For containing the data of existing music scores
LISP – A programming language
Nyquist – A programming language based on LISP
MaxMSP – A programming language created for music applications
Java – A programming language that I am familiar with
Python – A programming language that I am familiar with
C++ – A programming language that I am familiar with


Articles
https://ccrma.stanford.edu/~blackrse/algorithm.html
https://quod.lib.umich.edu/s/spobooks/bbv9810.0001.001

Caitlyn Connelly — Research Plan

  • Since I’ve already started the research process, I’ve included both topics and resources I’ve already studied as well as new ones.
  • Books
    • Jim Henson: The Biography by Brian Jay Jones
    • Imagination Illustrated: The Jim Henson Journal
    • The Good Neighbor: The Life and Work of Fred Rogers
    • How to Make a Good Script Great by Linda Seger
  • Articles
    • Collection of articles from several decades about children’s television in The New Yorker: https://www.newyorker.com/books/double-take/sunday-reading-childrens-television
    • Taking Silliness Seriously: Jim Henson’s The Muppet Show, the Anglo-American Tradition of Nonsense, and Cultural Critique
    • Dobrin, Sidney I. ‘‘‘It’s Not Easy Being Green’: Jim Henson, the Muppets, and Ecological Literacy.’’ Wild Things: Children’s Literature and Ecocriticism. Eds. Sidney I. Dobrin and Kenneth Kidd. Detroit, MI: Wayne State UP, 2004. 232–53.
    • Finch, Christopher. Of Muppets and Men: The Making of the Muppet Show. New York: Knopf, 1981.
    • Flescher, Jacqueline. ‘‘The Language of Nonsense in Alice.’’ Yale French Studies 43 (1969): 128–44.
    • Lecercle, Jean-Jacques. The Philosophy of Nonsense: The Intuitions of Victorian Nonsense Literature. New York: Routledge, 1994.
    • Lopez, Alan. ‘‘Deleuze With Carroll: Schizophrenia and Simulacrum and the Philosophy of Lewis Carroll’s Nonsense.’’ Angelaki: A New Journal in Philosophy, Literature and the Social Sciences 9.3 (December 2004): 101–20.
    • Noble, Greg, and Rebecca Baldwin. ‘‘Sly Chicks and Troublemakers: Car Stickers, Nonsense and the Allure of Strangeness.’’ Social Semiotics 11.1 (2001): 75–89.
    • Rackin, Donald. Alice’s Adventures in Wonderland and Through the Looking-Glass: Nonsense, Sense, and Meaning. New York: Twayne, 1991.
    • Sewell, Elizabeth. The Field of Nonsense. London: Chatto and Windus, 1952.
    • Shires, Linda. ‘‘Fantasy, Nonsense, Parody, and the Status of the Real:
      The Example of Carroll.’’ Victorian Poetry 26.3 (1988): 267–83.
    • Stewart, Susan. Nonsense: Aspects of Intertextuality in Folklore and Literature. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins UP, 1978.
  • Movies
    • The Muppet Movie
    • The Muppets Take Manhattan
    • Elmo in Grouchland
  • Television (P = for puppet research, T = for theme and tone research)
    • Sesame Street (P)
    • The Muppet Show (P)
    • Fraggle Rock (P)
    • Mr. Meaty (P)
    • Courage the Cowardly Dog (T)
    • Foster’s Home for Imaginary Friends (T)
    • The Grim Adventures of Billy and Mandy (T)
    • Pinky and the Brain (T)
    • Rocko’s Modern Life (T)
  • Online Courses